Mismatch between Equipment Parameters and Actual Working Conditions

Content: Establish a cross-departmental team consisting of technical personnel, frontline operators, and procurement staff in advance to sort out core working condition requirements (such as operation intensity, site size, and material characteristics) for specific operation scenarios (e.g., marking ore hardness and daily mining volume for mining operations, and specifying site slope and day-night temperature difference for infrastructure construction), and formulate a Working Condition Requirement List. The list should include “mandatory parameters” (e.g., maximum lifting capacity, working radius) and “preferred parameters” (e.g., fuel consumption, noise level) to avoid vague requirements. Request suppliers to provide equipment operation reports of projects with the same working conditions in the past 3 years (including data such as actual operation efficiency and failure frequency). For customized equipment, ask for 1:1 drawings to confirm the adaptability of key components. During the trial operation phase, simulate extreme working conditions (e.g., full-load operation, continuous operation for 8 hours), arrange frontline operators to participate in the entire process to record the equipment’s performance under different working conditions, and compare trial data with competitors. Finally, select equipment with a “parameter matching degree of ≥90%” to completely eliminate the problems of “over-purchasing (waste)” or “under-purchasing (insufficient capacity)”.